作者@article {CWE / 1047/2017 ={} ={}当前世界环境》杂志上的出版商= {},title ={评估职业灰尘和硅暴露在印度的石头采矿和破碎单位——案例研究},年={},月={},体积= {39},url = {www.a-i-l-s-a.com/article/1047/},页面= {663 - 671},在像印度这样快速发展的国家，碎石行业在经济和城市发展中扮演着至关重要的角色。印度的石矿和石磨厂位于主要城市周围，在全国范围内雇佣了大约50万人。然而，这个创造就业机会的行业碰巧也是产生灰尘最多的活动之一，也是呼吸系统疾病矽肺的前兆。这项研究的目的是评估工人在该行业中接触硅尘的个人情况。在印度泰伦加纳邦Nalgonda区郊区选定的单位，在连续三天的时间内，分别在碎石和采石(采石场)地区进行了个人粉尘采样(n=11)和(n=6)。然后估计可吸入粉尘暴露量和游离二氧化硅含量。可以观察到，来自破碎单元的三(3)破碎机助手样品的暴露超过了1948年印度工厂法案的允许限值(PLV)。两名来自石矿矿区的重型土方机械(HEMM)操作员被观察到已经超过了1952年印度矿产法和随后的规则所规定的允许最大暴露限度(PMEL)。来自矿区的HEMM操作员和来自破碎厂的破碎机助手的剩余样品被观察到在印度法定机构规定的各自指导方针的规定范围内。 Two different acts were considered, because of the fact that stone mining is regulated by the Indian mining act and under the overall control of Directorate of Mines and Safety (DGMS), Government of India. On the other hand Crusher plant comes under the ambit of Model Factory Rule 120 under section 87 of Indian Factories Act 1948 under the overall control of Directorate General Factory Service and Labour Institute (DGFASLI) Government of India. Post the study it could be concluded that, stone crushers are dustier as compared to stone mining area. Workers in stone mining and crushing units of study area are indeed exposed to high levels of respirable and silica laden dust. It was observed that safety and precautionary measures towards dust and silica exposure are not implemented necessitating to be taken by unit operators. }, number = {52}, doi = {10.12944/CWE.12.3.17} }